Performance Appraisal of a Worker: Full Concept

INTRODUCTION

A member of an organisation offers their thoughts or opinions regarding other members. The opinion could relate to how you interact with people, how you work, how you behave, etc. These viewpoints serve as the foundation for employee evaluations and for Performance Appraisal. For several reasons, including promotion, transfer, training, pay fixation, etc., a superior has an opinion about his ordinates.

MEANING

The systematic assessment of a worker’s performance by a professional or his immediate supervisor is known as a performance appraisal.

An evaluation involves comparing many individuals with others in a variety of contexts. The fundamental reason for evaluating a worker is to advance the worker Other activities are also covered by performance reviews.

The management conducts frequent appraisals. Both the employer and the employee should be aware of the date, time, and location of the evaluation. Personal biases and prejudices are avoided in the assessment in order to prevent inaccurate employee evaluations.

DEFINITION

According to Edwin B. Flippo, “Performance evaluation is a systematic, repeated, and, to the greatest extent feasible, an objective rating of an employee’s excellence in subjects relevant to his existing work and to his potential for a better employment.”

For an efficient evaluation, the management has previously set a’s performance goals. A worker’s performance is evaluated against the requirements of their position.

Scott, Clotheir, and Spriegal claim that “For regular employees and apprentices, performance appraisal serves as a record of progress. It also serves as a guide for decisions regarding promotions, transfers, or demotions. It also serves as a guide for compiling lists for bonus distribution, seniority consideration, and pay rates.

Importance / Significance of performance evaluation

The management now use performance evaluation as a tool. The scope of performance evaluation is broadened to encompass numerous judgments in addition to pay fixation:

1. Performance evaluations assist management in deciding whether to raise an employee’s pay.
2. Ongoing employee evaluations serve to raise a worker’s level of competence in the workplace.
3. When management is ready to give appropriate facilities for successful performance, the performance evaluation highlights the facilities that are accessible to an employee.
4. It reduces the lack of communication between the employer and the employee.
5. An employee’s performance review serves as the foundation for a promotion.
6. Performance reviews may be used to determine a worker’s training requirements.
7. An employee’s performance review is also taken into consideration when deciding whether to terminate them from their position.
8. A person who is not a good match for a position might be moved to one where they are.
9. Performance evaluations decrease complaints from employees.
10. An employee’s work happiness raises morale. Performance evaluations help to reach this level of work satisfaction.
11. It enhances the bond between employers and employees.

Limitations of Performance Appraisal

1. The methodologies used for performance evaluation are unreliable.
2. If an employer knows an employee well, the performance review may not be accurate.
3. A supervisor’s incapacity to evaluate an employee prevents them from providing an accurate performance evaluation.
4. No performance assessment system can accurately assess all of an employee’s attributes.
5. A boss may think favourably of a worker to avoid getting his ire.
6. When evaluating employee performance, managers do not adhere to uniform criteria.

Check here for latest case studies and research book : https://kit.co/Anurooba/case-analysis-text-books

Types / Kinds of Performance Appraisal

There are several kinds of performance reviews available. However, the management only wants to use one style of performance review. Any of the two methods are used to complete the evaluation. Traits and outcomes are the two methods.

The characteristics method means evaluating the worker based on their attitudes. The results method means evaluating the employee based on the outcomes or the tasks they have completed. Following is a basic description of the many performance evaluation types:

1) Ranking Method: This straightforward style of performance evaluation is highly traditional and basic. Under this system, each employee in the working group is rated against each other.

If there are ten employees in the working group, for instance, the most efficient worker would be rated first, and the least efficient would be placed tenth. The working group’s employees are rated from 1 to 3, and so on.

Advantages

(a) Every worker or employee may be contrasted with another individual.

(b) The ranking approach may provide the most advantages to a small organisation.

Diadvantages

(a) A large organisation cannot reap significant advantages from the ranking system.

(a) The ranking system does not assess an employee’s uniqueness.

(C) Its evaluation of personnel lacks objectivity.

2) Paired Comparison Approach: This ranking method includes this technique. A large organisation has created the paired comparison approach for use there. Each employee is evaluated in comparison to other workers, one at a time. The assessor compares two workers and marks the one he believes to be the superior employee with a check mark.

An person is compared to all other current workers in the same manner. The best employee is the one that receives the most ticks for being a better employee. The number of comparisons is determined using the formula n(n-1)/2, where N is the total number of comparisons. The number of individuals compared and the number of paired comparisons are shown in the following table.

Advantages

(A) This approach is appropriate for large organisations.

(a) Using this methodology, individual traits are assessed.

Disadvantages

(A) It is challenging to grasp this strategy.

(a) It requires significant

Number of Persons to be Compared	Number of Paired Comparison
2	1
3	3
4	6
5	10
6	15
7	21
8	28
9	36
10	45

3)Forced Distribution Technique: This method uses a forced Groupwise ranking system. For instance, a group of employees using the Forced Distribution Method to rate an employee’s total performance would be placed in the same category as superior, at and above average, below average, and above suitable bad.

The rater assigns a 15% superior rating to 15% of the workforce and a 35% at and to big organisation rating to 35% of the workforce. However, the individual attributes could not be evaluated using this methodology, which rated 35% of employees as below average and 15% as terrible.

A BEST WAY TO EARN WHILE YOU STUDY, JOIN THIS APP UPLOAD PHOTOS, SAVE MONEY FROM NOW ON : https://bit.ly/3g7PxAg

5)Grading: Specific employee performance or ability categories will be assigned a specified way in advance.Extremely excellent, good, ordinary, bad, and very poor are examples of these ratings. The check list approach is used to evaluate a worker’s aptitude by having them respond to a series of questions.

These inquiries pertain to an employee’s behaviour. A different department known as the personnel department conducts the assessment. However, a person who is designated as a rater is assigned the responsibility of collecting the check list responses.

The rater marks each answer an employee provided in response to a question. Each question and answer option has two columns.

6)Forced Choice Method: An employee has created a number of groupings of assertions. However, using this system requires the rater to check off any statement, whether it is positive or negative.

These two sentences both explain the traits of positive or negative remarks. From one remark to the next, different aspects of an employee’s traits are described differently.

The affirmative assertions are as follows:

(A) The worker typically completes the task on time.

(a) The employee is capable of carrying out the task and doing so when necessary.

The unfavourable remarks are likewise produced in this manner. All of these remarks form the foundation for the final grade. However, the rater is unaware of the statements that will determine the final rating.

7)Critical Incident Method: An employee’s performance is evaluated on the basis of situations that directly affected the person in question. Some occurrences happened as a result of an employee’s incapability. However, the grade is based on every occurrence that happened within that time period. Below are a few of the occasions or incidents:

(b) Refusing to participate in further training.

(c) Lost patience with coworkers or inferiors.

(d) Made a production-method modification suggestion.

(e) Made a suggestion for a method to raise the calibre of the products.

(f) A technique to prevent or reduce waste, spoilage, and scrap is suggested.

(g) Refused to follow instructions.

(h) Refused to carry out directions that were obvious.

8)Field Review Method: The performance of an employee is evaluated via an interview between the rater and the employee’s immediate superior or supervisor. The rater works for the personnel division.

The rater queries the supervisors about an employee’s performance. Based on the data gathered, the personnel department creates a thorough report. After receiving approval from the supervisor, a copy of this report is added to the concerned employee’s personnel file.

The interviewer’s skill determines if this kind of evaluation approach is successful.

Barriers to Effective Performance Appraisal

Effective performance reviews have several obstacles. They are succinctly described.

1. The rater makes incorrect assumptions about a worker who is subject to the performance evaluation system.
2. A worker could behave indifferently while being evaluated.
3. It is assumed that no form of employee appraisal can offer an accurate assessment of the employee. However, the rater essentially thinks that a procedure that is used in an organisation can deliver a 100% correct rating.
4. According to management, a direct superior’s subjective assessment is preferable to a formal evaluation and review process.
5. Workers believe that their superiors’ judgments are not reliable. The superior’s evaluation can be incorrect.
6. A few psychological reasons are to blame for poor performance reviews. The psychological aspects include the appraiser having more work to do, conflicts with subordinates arising, and the appraiser being afraid to point out the inefficiency of subordinates, among others.
7. There is no exact benchmark against which to measure task performance.
8. The quality of the ratee’s work may have an impact on the rater. The rater may evaluate the employee’s performance as a whole based on their first impression.
9. Another issue is the superior’s incapacity to assess the worker’s performance.
10. 9. The obstacles to efficient performance evaluations are the predominate familial or friendship relationships between the parties.
11. If the rater was negligent in any way, an erroneous assessment was made.
12. The rater’s preferences may have an impact on how well he is rated.

Principles of Effective Performance Appraisal

A systematic performance evaluation should be accurate and trustworthy. Every time management overcomes performance assessment hurdles, the dependability and accuracy of the process are attained. The following actions might be taken by the management to address the

1. Two raters rate a single employee. Next, a comparison is done to get a reliable rating.
2. Ongoing, direct monitoring of a worker is necessary for making efficient performance evaluations.
3. Any subordinate in an organisation should have their immediate superior rate them.
4. For efficient performance reviews, a separate department might be established.
5. The concerned employee is informed of the rating. It benefits in several ways. The employee is able to comprehend his current situation and where he should be moving. be acknowledged. However, the negative aspects shouldn’t be overemphasised; they might only be hinted at.
6. The good points of an employee should points should not be underlined too much but they may be intimated to him.
7. The management must instil trust in the minds of the workforce.
8. The management should choose the requirements for each position.
9. Depending on the nature of the work, separate printed forms should be used for each performance review.

Other Related Topics